Satyendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48786 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-755 Year-2019 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH Son of Rajendra Singh Resident of village - Telda, Post - Kirhindi, P.S. - Shivsagar, Distt. - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pinki Devi Wife of Ramchandra Sah Resident of village - Kenar Khurd, Post - Sikraul, P.S. - Chenari, Distt. - Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Singh For the State :

Ms. Madhuri Lata For the Complainant :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh No. 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner has taken Rs. 1,60,000/- from the complainant for which he has leased his 1 acre 23 decimal land and promised to pay Rs. 30,000/- per year to the complainant but after three years, he refused to return his total money of Rs. 2,50,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48786 of 2023(3) dt.12-10-2023 2/3 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that in the registered Rehan, nothing has been mentioned as alleged in the complaint petition regarding payment of Rs. 30,000/- to the complainant every year, therefore, allegation of payment of Rs. 2,50,000/- is totally false and concocted. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that the petitioner has not returned Rs. 2,50,000/- to the complainant.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that it is a money/civil nature dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complainant Case No. 755 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48786 of 2023(3) dt.12-10-2023 3/3 Cr.P.C.

7. Learned Court below shall accept the bail bond of the petitioner after verifying the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T