Sunil Sah v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43964 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1932 Year- 2016 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- EASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Sunil Sah, Son of Late Tulsi Sah, resident of Village- Manikpur roopdih, P.S.- Harsidhi, Dist.- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Lalti Devi, Wife of Sunil Sah, D/o Luti Sah, resident of villageManikpur, Rupdih, P.S.- Harsidhi, Dist.- East Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Trial No. 1941 of 2016, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1932 of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 498(A), 323 and 504 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the complainant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43964 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the State that the petitioner is named in the complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Trial No.

1941 of 2016, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1932 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., 3rd, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T