← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2307/2015disposed

Kameshwar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-21Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2307 of 2015 ====================================================== Kameshwar Pandey, S/O Late Jatadhari Pandey, Resident of House No. 23, Road No. 8/C, Rajeev Nagar, P.S.- Rajvee Nagar, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar

3. Sri Ravi Mittal, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna

4. Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

5. Sri Ram Pukar Ranjan, Engineer in Chief (Project Co-ordinator), Tube Well Wing, Minor Water Resource Dept., Viswesaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

6. Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, Accountant General (A & E), Bihar, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kuber Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 21-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and opposite parties.

Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the payments have been made to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts the position as to the payment, but refers to the order of the writ Court, which indicates that if there is delay over one month, the arrears would carry interest. He submits that the interest in terms of the direction issued by the writ Court has not been paid. Considering the fact that payments have been made, the present proceeding is dropped. However, if the interest

Patna High Court MJC No.2307 of 2015(6) dt.21-01-2019 2/2 payable in terms of the direction of the writ Court is not paid with calculation of the petitioner within a period of 60 days from today, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to file affidavit for revival of the present application. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U