Amoj Ram @ Amoj @ Manoj Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40433 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Amoj Ram @ Amoj @ Manoj Ram, Son of Sudarsan Ram,

2. Samod Ram, Son of Sudarsan Ram,

3. Sudarshan Ram, Son of Jhuman Ram, Resident of Village- Pokhraha, P.S.- Muffasil, Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 61 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-323, 354(A), 308, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. It is alleged that one Chhotu Kumar used to pass comments against the informant. There is general and omnibus allegation that these petitioners along with Chhotu Kumar started assaulting with lathi, Danda, when the brother of the informant went to the house of Chhotu Kumar to inquire about the matter.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40433 of 2017 (2) dt.03-10-2017 2/2 of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 61 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T