Shailesh Kumar @ Suggi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45849 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-539 Year-2024 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Shailesh Kumar @ Suggi S/o Late Akhilesh Thakur R/o Village- Nisarpura, P.S.- Bhelawar, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 539 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 304(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that when the informant was returning after collecting money, three unknown miscreants intercepted him and looted the bag containing cash amounting to Rs. 70,000/- along with motorcycle and mobile phone of the informant and fled away.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45849 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Sonu Kumar. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. Chargesheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2025 and has three criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, charge-sheet already being submitted as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Makhdumpur P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45849 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 3/3 Case No. 539 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T