Vinod Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68298 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2011 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ======================================================

1. Vinod Rai Son of Sri Kishun Rai,

2. Santosh Rai @ Santosh Kumar Rai,

3. Munna Rai,

4. Tunna Rai, Petitioner no.2 to 4 are sons of Praduman Rai, All residents of Village- Khakhadahi, Police Station- Dinara, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 302/34 IPC registered in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 105/2011.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on mere suspicion except which there is no objective material to connect the petitioners with the alleged occurrence. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP submits on the basis of para 276 of the case diary that the DIG of police, Sahabad Range, Dehri-onSone has recommended for submission of charge sheet showing the case to be untrue.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68298 of 2018(3) dt.01-02-2019 2/2

5. The petitioners are unable to satisfy this Court about the immediate apprehension of their arrest, as such, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T