Hira Lal Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3357 of 2015 ====================================================== Hira Lal Jaiswal S/o Ram Bilas Chaudhary, Resident of Village and P.O. Lakho, District Lakhisarai, the retired Basic Health Worker, Primary Health Centre, Dandari, District Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Additional Secretary, Health Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director-in-Chief, health Services, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Begusarai, District Begusarai.

5.

The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary health Centre, Dandari, District Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Fazle Karim, AC to SC 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024 Petitioner has sought interference of this Court on the basis of the fact that the petitioner has been terminated with effect from 08.12.2014 in light of letter no.901 dated 30.09.2014, which has been issued in view of order dated 24.09.2014 passed by this Court in LPA No.200 of 2010 and other analogous cases.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that against the said order, the affected party has preferred SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

3. It is admitted fact that after thorough inquiry, as per

Patna High Court CWJC No.3357 of 2015(3) dt.19-08-2024 2/2 the direction of this Court, the order of termination was passed. There is no averment in the writ petition, as to whether, the petitioner was given any opportunity before the order of termination contained in Memo No.3376 dated 08.12.2014 was passed and similar order of termination is subject matter before the Apex Court and, as such, at this stage, I don't find to interfere in any manner with the termination order.

4. The writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy after disposal of SLP, if any filed against the order dated 24.09.2014 passed in LPA No. 200 of 2010.

5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U