← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70139/2018bail granted

Upendra Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.70139 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-900 Year-2018 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ======================================================

1. Upendra Rai

2. Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Kumar, Both Sons of Sanchit Rai.

3. Jitendra Rai @ Jitendra Kumar, Son of Late Shankar Rai.

4. Pramod Kumar, Son of Siparsan Rai @ Sheo Persan Rai.

5. Santosh Kumar, Son of Surendra Rai.

6. Lalu Kumar, Son of Surendra Rai.

7. Bikash Kumar, Son of Harendra Rai.

8. Siparsan Rai @ Sheo Persan Rai, Son of Triveni Rai,

9. Harendra Rai, Son of Triveni Rai, All resident of Village- Rahimpur, Police Station- Sonpur, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 452, 380, 386, 504, 506 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that accused persons are alleged to have entered in the premises of the informant and damaged the ATM installed in the said premises and also, took away Rs. 10,000,00/- of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70139 of 2018(3) dt.29-01-2019 2/2 is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. The present case has been instituted in retaliation of the case, earlier instituted by petitioner No. 7, namely, Bikash Kumar.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 900 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T