Rajdeo Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40745 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2017 Thana -DHAKA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Rajdeo Rai Son of Jailal Rai, R/o village- Jadopur Bakhri, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Dhaka P.S. Case No.120 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

The informant has lodged an FIR stating therein that his husband has been kidnapped and might have been killed. Dead body of the victim was recovered in Nepal which was identified by the son of the informant. In the impugned order several paragraphs of the case diary has been mentioned which corroborates the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40745 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apprehension has been made in the First Information Report and there is nothing except that. In such type of cases apprehension can be shown by the informant. Evidences are collected during investigation because it is a case of kidnapping. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected.

Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U T