Anirudh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7756 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA PS District- East Champaran ====================================================== Anirudh Kumar S/O Yogi Mukhiya @ Yogendra Mukhiya Resident Of Village - Katha Dhobha, Bhawanipur, P.S. - Sangrampur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pinki Kumari D/o Birendra Mukhiya Resident of Village - Koyla Belwa, P.S.- Chakiya, Distt.- East Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Md. Shamimul Hoda, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP For Opp. Party No. 2 :

Mr. Surya Narayan Yadav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Motihari Mahila P.S. Case No.16 of 2020 registered for offences under Sections 420, 406 and 493/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been jointly submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute between the parties has been settled and the petitioner paid Rs.300000/- (Rupees three lakhs) to opposite party no.2.

Mr. Surya Narayan Yadav, learned cousnel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7756 of 2021(3) dt.24-01-2022 2/2 opposite party no.2 submits that his client has received the amount in question.

In view of the aforesaid submission, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

Accordingly, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within ten weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Motihari Mahila P.S. Case No.16 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

However, before accepting bail bond of the petitioner, the court below shall call upon the opposite party no.2 and get itself satisfied that the dispute between the parties has been settled.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application is allowed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T