Prayag Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2762 of 2012 =========================================================== Prayag Mahto, Son of Late Saryug Mahto, Resident of Bakhari, P.S.- Bakhari, District-Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Education Officer, Begusarai

3. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Begusarai

4. The Block Education Officer, Bakhari, Begusarai

5. The Headmaster, Middle School, Vikram Nadail, P.S.-Bakhari, DistrictBegusarai

6. Bihar School Examination Board, Patna through its Chairman. .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amaresh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG-14 For the Board : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State as well as Board.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has died during the pendency of the writ application. In view of the above, liberty shall be available to the heirs of the petitioner, if so advised, to file separate writ application for agitating the grievance, if the heirs of the petitioner has right to sue.

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 04.08.2018 Transmission Date