Md. Jamil Javed @ Munna v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3193 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MD. JAMIL JAVED @ MUNNA S/o Md. Mojibur Rehman Resident of Vill.- Dalour, Sobham, P.S.- Simri, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Farhat Naaz D/o Mukhtar Ahmad, resident of village-Ijrahta, P.S. Manigachhi, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Shahnawaz Ali, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the opposite parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 75 of 2019 registered under Sections 323, 379, 498A, 420, 494 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against him.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that the petitioner is the husband of the informant. There is specific

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3193 of 2021(3) dt.25-11-2021 2/2 allegation of torture and demand of dowry against the petitioner. Further submission is that the petitioner again married with Roshni Anmol in January, 2019. Hence, this is not a fit case of anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Harish/- U T