Satendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48190 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2020 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Satendra Yadav Son of Late Kailash Yadav Resident of Village- Chandakhurd, P.S.- Wazirganj in the district of Gaya Ji ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2020 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 308, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
03. As per prosecution case, the petitioner had been abusing the informant and when the informant opposed, he tried to assault him. The informant in order to save his life, started running away. When one Kewal Yadav intervened to save the informant. Then the petitioner and other co-accused persons
2/4 assaulted him with khanti and lathi.
04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is having land dispute with Kewal Yadav and on the date of occurrence, Kewal Yadav and others came to the house of the petitioner and misbehaved with his family members. For the said occurrence, Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 69 of 2020 was registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As the petitioner was not present in the house, after not finding the petitioner in the house, Kewal Yadav and others came and misbehaved with lady family members and also snatched ornaments and taking advantage of this fact, the informant has instituted this false case in order to save his skin.
The injury report of Kewal Yadav falsifies the allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted Kewal Yadav with Khanti as three sharp cut injuries have been found on the person of Kewal Yadav whereas the 4th injury is lacerated wound. Thus, there is absence of any injury caused by Khanti. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is having clean antecedent and he is in custody since 28.04.2026. Charge sheet has been submitted.
3/4
05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.
06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the absence of injury attributed to the petitioner and also considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean antecedent and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Gaya Ji/concerned Court in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2020, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the
4/4 petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T