Patna High CourtCWJC/4257/2012dfd for non appearance

Janardan Singh And ORS v. Tej Narayan Singh And ORS

2018-09-14Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.4257 of 2012 (10) dt.14-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4257 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Janardan Singh Son Of Late Ramautar Singh Resident Of VillageKatghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

2. Shaktidhar Singh Son Of Late Bal Govind Singh Resident Of VillageKatghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

3. Pawan Kumar Singh Son Of Late Bal Govind Singh Resident Of Village- Katghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

4. Urmila Devi Wife Of Late Bal Govind Singh Resident Of VillageKatghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

5. Gopal Singh Son Of Late Bal Mukund Singh Resident Of VillageKatghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

6. Nageshwar Singh Son Of Late Bal Mukund Singh Resident Of VillageKatghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

7. Vimal Kumar Singh Son Of Late Bal Mukund Singh Resident Of Village- Katghara, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

8. Smt. Phool Kumari Daughter Of Late Bal Mukund Singh, Wife Of Shri Rajesh Prasad Singh Resident Of Village- Ranna, P.S. Hathauri, District - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Tej Narayan Singh Son Of Late Sita Devi And Late Mahabir Singh Resident Of Village - Dubepur, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

2. Shiv Narayan Singh Son Of Late Sita Devi And Late Mahabir Singh Resident Of Village - Dubepur, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur

3. Ajit Kumar Singh Son Of Late Sita Devi And Late Mahabir Singh Resident Of Village - Dubepur, P.S.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 Perused the office notes. Nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

It appears that the petitioners have ceased to have interest in prosecuting this writ application. As such, this application is dismissed.

B.Kr./- (Sanjay Kumar, J) U