Mukesh Rajhans @ Mukesh Kumar Rajhans v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47341 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2019 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Mukesh Rajhans @ Mukesh Kumar Rajhans, S/O Late Surenu Mohan Rajhans @ Surendra Mohan Rajhans Resident Of Mohalla- Murtujachak (Mritujachak), Mirjanhat, P.S.- Babarganj, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ansul Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda For the Informant :
Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh For the State :
Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. A report has been received from the Court of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-XVI, Bhagalpur dated 13.09.2022 wherein it has been recorded that if the defence and prosecution would cooperate with the trial, the present case may be disposed of within a period of six months. The learned counsel for the informant submits that instead of giving a period of six months, a period of three months may be granted from today during which, the entire prosecution witnesses excluding the official witnesses would be examined.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47341 of 2022(3) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 Since the learned trial Court has requested for a six months' time for disposing of the case, as such, six months further time is granted to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial, at the same time, the learned counsel for the informant is directed to ensure that the prosecution witnesses appear as and when required by the learned trial Court. In the event, if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from today, the petitioner shall file his bail application in the learned Court below itself. Further, if the learned trial Court is of the view that there was delay on part of the prosecution in completing the trial, then shall release the petitioner on bail. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T