Tetar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47874 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -54 Year- 2012 Thana -CHANDAUTI District- GAYA ====================================================== Tetar Yadav S/o Late Sital Yadav, resident of Village- Sona Bigha, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 337, 326, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case got initiated on the written repot of Mahesh Yadav dated 16.02.2012 is to the effect that on 16.02.2012 the informant came to his house when he found his mother in an injured condition, who suggested that Runa Devi, Panwa Devi, Kaili Devi, Sudamiya Devi, Ramratiya Devi, Soni Devi, Amit Yadav and Manish Yadav assaulted her, in the meantime, Mohan Yadav, Tetar Yadav (petitioner), Ramashish Yadav and Birendra Yadav came and started pelting bricks and stones, as a result, Subachani Devi and Guriya Kumari received

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47874 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the injuries of Subachani Devi and Guriya Kumari are found to be simple in nature. One of the injuries of the mother of the informant has been found grievous but she had not been assaulted by the petitioner. Accusation is omnibus and general against the petitioner. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP submits that the accusation of assault is omnibus and general against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 54 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T