← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53016/2024allowed

Raushan Yadav @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53016 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Raushan Yadav @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Yadav Son of Ram Pravesh Yadav Resident of Vill- Thavai, P.S.- Rafiganj, DistrictAurangabad. 2.

Gudan Yadav @ Gudan Kumar @ Gudan Kumar Yadav Son of Ram Pravesh Yadav Resident of Vill- Thavai, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad. 3.

Mrityunjay Yadav @ Mrityunjay Kumar @ Mirtyunjay Kumar Yadav Son of Jitendra Yadav Resident of Vill- Thavai, P.S.- Rafiganj, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard the parties.

2.

The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act. 3.

As per the FIR, petitioners and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant's side by means of deadly weapons due the which they sustained injuries.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53016 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submitted that the injuries are of simple nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injury of the injured is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No.108 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T