Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29848/2014dismissed

Janardan Singh And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-06-21Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29848 of 2014 (2) dt.21-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29848 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Janardan Singh, Son of Late Dhanik Lal Singh.

2. Hare Ram Singh, Son of Late Dhanik Lal Singh.

3. Umesh Singh, Son of Late Dhanik Lal Singh.

4. Ram Jugat Singh, Son of Late Dhanik Lal Singh.,

5. Meena Devi, Wife of Late Ram Udgar Singh, All residents of villagePawra, Police Station-Cheriya Bariyarpur (Manjhaul Out Post), DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Parshuram Singh,

3. Narendra Singh, Both sons of Sri Ram Sagar Singh,

4. Ram Sagar Singh, Son of Late Govind Singh, Sl. Nos.2 to 4 residents of village-Pawra, Police Station-Cheriya Bariyarpur (Manjhaul Out Post), District-Begusarai.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sangita Sharma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

This application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the order dated 18.12.2013 passed in Criminal Revision No. 60 of 2013 whereunder the learned the Additional Session Judge-V, Begusarai, allowed the aforesaid criminal revision of second party/Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4 by setting aside the order dated 17.01.2013 passed in Case No. 117M of 2012 by the S.D.M., Manjhaul, rejecting the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29848 of 2014 (2) dt.21-06-2016 application of the second party/opposite party nos.2 to 4 to drop the proceeding, under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C., with direction to the parties to file their written statement.

On going through the impugned order, I find no illegality amounting to abuse of the process of court for interference with the same. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T