← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5767/2015dismiss for nonprosecution

Ram Uchit Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-15Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5767 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Ram Uchit Mahto and Anr son of Late Lakhan Mahto 2.

Ramanand Mahto son of Late Sheonandan Mahto Both are resident of Village- Basantpur, Karah, P.O.- Sakh- Mohan P.S.- Bebhutipur, DistrictSamastipur, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

3.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur.

4.

The Circle Officer, Bibhutipur Block, Anchal Bibhutipur, Samastipur. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Laheriyasarai, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, AC to GP-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners though State is present.

2. On 08.07.2025 also, there was no appearance.

3. This writ application has been preferred for: issuance of a direction to authorities concerned Respondents to pay an appropriate compensation to the petitioners for their acquired lands for construction of an approaching road to the bridge constructed under the Mukhiya Mantri Setu Nirman Yojana, 2006-2007 situated in Karakh Gram Panchyat Anchal, Bibhutipur, District Samastipur by Bihar Pul Nirman

Patna High Court CWJC No.5767 of 2015(4) dt.15-07-2025 2/2 Nigam, Patna.

4. Contrary to the case presented by the petitioners that their land have acquired but no compensation paid, the counter affidavit of the respondent no. 1 to 4 at paragraph no. 16 records that land in question has not been acquired and/or taken by the respondents. The said paragraph further records that a fresh process was initiated later.

5. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T