Raj Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46084 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2022 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Raj Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Singh, S/o- Nagina Singh, R/o VillageBaradih Police Station- Karakat District-Rohtas at Sasaram 2.

Dharmendra Singh, S/o- Babban Singh, R/o Village- Baradih, Police Station- Karakat District-Rohtas at Sasaram 3.

Raj Kapoor Singh, S/o- Nagina Singh, R/o Village- Baradih, Police StationKarakat District-Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 115 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other being armed with lathi-danda and rami assaulted the informant. There is specific allegation against one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46084 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/3 Raj Kumar Yadav, petitioner no. 1 that he has assaulted with rami on the hand of the informant due to which he received injury on hand and neck.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the nature of injury is simple. Petitioner no. 1 is having criminal antecedent of three cases out of which in one case, he is on bail. Petitioner no.2 is having no criminal antecedent and petitioner no.3 is having criminal antecedent of one case in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 115 of 2022, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46084 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 3/3 Judicial Magistrate-II, Bikramganj, Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T