Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25149 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2019 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== ANIL KUMAR SINGH S/O RAM ASHRAY SINGH @ DOCTOR R/O VILLAGE SARAIYA, P.S.-KACHHAWAN, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 05-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the informant that he received a telephonic call from his mother informing him that his wife had run away taking along with her some money and ornaments. It is stated that even on earlier occasion his wife had run away with the petitioner herein. The petitioner had taken her away with the intent of marriage. The whereabouts of his wife not having been found, the instant FIR was registered.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. An

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25149 of 2021(4) dt.05-01-2022 2/2 unfounded suspicion has been raised against him in the FIR. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. The petitioner is a happily married man living with his family consisting of his wife and two sons. He is also suffering from various medical ailments. Inspite of the petitioner being in custody since 13.1.2020, the investigating authorities have not been able to find the whereabouts of the wife of the informant and are falsely implicating this petitioner. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the material on record including that which had transpired in course of investigation together with the petitioner having remained in custody for about 2 years, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Karakat P.S. Case no. 300 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas. Spd/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T