Paras Kumar @ Paras Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56028 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2025 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Paras Kumar @ Paras Yadav, Son of Arun Yadav, Resident of village - Khutiya, P.S.- Mansi, District - Khagaria, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Seema Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 10 litres of illegal country made mahua wine and aluminum tasla and one drum was recovered from the field of one Manoj Kumar. It is alleged that the seized liquor has been manufactured by the six accused persons including the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioenr was neither present on the spot nor any incriminating article was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56028 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No one identified that the petitioner was at the spot. There is no independent witness to the seizure list which is the violation of provision under Section 103 of the BNSS. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation of this case.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T