← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47332/2022bail rejected

Narayan Ram @ Satyanarayan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-15Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47332 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-400 Year-2022 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Narayan Ram @ Satyanarayan Ram Son of Late Ramchandra Ram Resident of Village - Pachkathwa, Ward no.24, P.S.- Daudnagar, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case no. 400 of 2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Prosecution case relates to recovery of 52 litres illcit country made wine from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery of illicit country made liquor. It is further submitted that neither the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47332 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious and constructive possession. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that the illicit liquor in question has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the alleged house belongs to the petitioner, from where recovery of illegal liquor has been made, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T