Patna High CourtL.P.A/1620/2015dfd for non appearance

Ramesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-27Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1620 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4804 of 2015 ====================================================== Ramesh Mahto son of Late Kardhani Mahto resident of Village - Kusuma Bardihar, P.S. Singar, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Aurangabad.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad.

6. The Programme Officer, Obera, District - Aurangabad.

7. The Block Development Officer, Obera, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar No.6, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Balak Mahto ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 27-06-2018 It is reported that the appellant has expired and the counsel is not getting any information or instruction. In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution with liberty to the legal heirs of the appellant to seek restoration, if they so desire.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) K.C.jha/- U