Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51062 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3508 Year-2015 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Sri Shyam Kishore Sah Resident of MohallaManoharpur Kachhuara, P.S.-Gopalpur, Town and District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Soni Kumari @ Soni Devi Wife of Ravi Ranjan Kumar, daughter of Sri Bishun Sao Resident of Mohalla-Astipur lala Chak, P.O-Ijra, P.S.-Hajipur, District-Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Maijorwar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Vaishali Complaint Case No. 3508 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498 A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with O.P. No. 2 on 7.2.2015 and customary presents were given on the occasion of the marriage but the accused persons subjected the complainant to atrocity for non-fulfillment of demand of rupees five lacs cash and a motorcycle. She was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51062 of 2019(8) dt.27-10-2021 2/3 driven out to her parental house and after some time she was again brought to his matrimonial house but again she was tortured.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

For taking the recourses of amicable settlement the notice was issued to the Opposite Party No. 2 but from a perusal of the record it appears that notice was received by one Vishal Kumar. Despite the notices, the Opposite Party No. 2 did not turn up.

As such, considering these facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the court below on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-16-cum-sub judge-17, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Vaishali Complaint Case No. 3508 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with further condition that the court below shall explore the possibility of amicable settlement by taking the recourse of District Mediation Center, and if it is found that amicable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51062 of 2019(8) dt.27-10-2021 3/3 settlement could not take place due to apathy or noncooperation of the petitioner, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) SONALI/- U T