Brahmdeo Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3638 of 2015 ====================================================== Brahmdeo Mahto Son of Late Chulahai Mahto Resident of Village - Maeel, P.O. - Bhairopur Dyodhi, P.S. - Bindupur, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna - 3.

3.

The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

4.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

7.

The Managing Committee of Takhat Sri Hari Mandir Sahib through its Secretary Sri Hari Mandir Sahib, ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"against the order dated 25.01.2010 passed by Principal Secretary, Revenue Reforms and Land Department, by which two acres of land belonging to the petitioner has been settled with the respondent 2nd set the Managing Committee of Takhat Sri Hari Mandir Sahib showing the land as Gar Majarua Aam Sota in plot no. 892, although

Patna High Court CWJC No.3638 of 2015(3) dt.20-01-2026 2/2 as record itself the government has got only 11 decimal of Gar Majarua Aam land in plot no. 892, mauza Sukurmarpur and as such land of the petitioner has been settled with respondent 2nd set in most illegal, wrongful and arbitrary manner."

3. It has been informed by Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, in the presence of learned State counsel that the sole petitioner died long back and he do not have any contact with the heirs. As such, heirs be granted to agitate the matter afresh is they so want.

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. In view of the fact that the sole petitioner is no more, granting liberty to the heirs to move afresh, if they so want, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U