Janki Raman Sahi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8080 of 2015 =========================================================== Janki Raman Sahi, S/o Late Shankar Sahi, Resident of Village Rampur Dakshin, P.S. Hathauri, District Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Dy. Development Commissioner, Muzaffarpur.
3. The Sub Divisional Officer (East.), Muzaffarpur.
4. The Block Development Officer, Aurai, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, AC to SC 27 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 21-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo no. 147 dated 12.03.2015 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, (East) Muzaffarpur by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit Rs. 17,23,405.20 paise against the price of rice supplied under SGRY scheme to the tune of 1257 quintals 96 Kg.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the Sub-Divisional Officer, (East) Muzaffarpur (respondent no.
3) is directed to consider and dispose of the show cause reply of the petitioner said to have been filed 13.04.2015 (Annexure-4) in which
Patna High Court CWJC No.8080 of 2015 dt.21-08-2018 2/2 event the writ petition need not be pressed on merits.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has been heard.
5. Having regard to the nature of the grievances and the stand of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer, (East) Muzaffarpur (respondent no. 3) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's show cause reply (Annexure-4), if the same is still pending before him, after grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 23.08.2018 Transmission Date N.A.