Vikash Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2846 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2020 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR MANJHI Son of Shiv Kumar Manjhi Resident of Mangolapur, P.S.-Jalalpur, District-Chapra (Saran) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 370 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Sections 414, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on the disclosure made by one of the co-accused Sunil Kumar Singh, this petitioner was arrested with one stolen silver colour Bolero vehicle. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. The vehicle in question was in fact recovered from the side of road which was parked far away from the house of petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2020 having no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2846 of 2021(2) dt.10-03-2021 2/2 has already been submitted.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 370 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T