Rimjhim Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48117 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2022 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna ====================================================== Rimjhim Kumari Daughter of Raghvendra Kumar Resident of MohallaBasantpur, P.S- Birpur, Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to the prosecution case, the petitioner utilized a forged certificate of post graduation for appointment on the post of Assistant Professor.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that pursuant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48117 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 2/3 to the advertisement issued by the Bihar State University Service Commission, the petitioner has applied for the post of Assistant Professor and submitted the document as prescribed in the advertisement. He further submits that the present F.I.R. is instituted on the ground that her post graduation certificate is false and fabricated. He further submits that the petitioner has obtain the same from the institute in question. He further submits that she has no concern at all with the forged and fabricated certificate as alleged in the F.I.R. The learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48117 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 3/3 be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) vanisha/- U T