← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/4558/2018allowed

Krishna Narayan Choudhary @ Krish Narayan Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-05-01Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4558 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2018 Thana- SC/ST District- Katihar ====================================================== Krishna Narayan Choudhary @ Krish Narayan Choudhary Son of Late Lakshmi Choudhary, Resident of Village- Roshna Bazar, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The state of Bihar and Anr Bihar 2.

Putul Devi Wife of Banbari Paswan, Resident of Village- Roshna Bazar, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Smt Usha Kumari No ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been directed against the order dated 14.08.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, -cum- Special Judge SC/ST, Katihar in connection with Katihar P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018 registered under Sections 323, 452, 380, 354 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act, whereby the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the appellants has been rejected. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4558 of 2018(7) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 complaint has been lodged after one year from the date of occurrence without explaining the plausible delay, which creates doubt over the prosecution version. The parties are co-villagers and on account of Pranpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017, the appellant has falsely been made accused in this case. Hence, the appellant may be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named appellant in the event of his surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, -cum- Special Judge, SC/ST, Katihar n in connection with Katihar SC/ST P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U