Ved Prakash Choudhry v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39286 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2014 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ved Prakash Choudhry Son of Basudeo Choudhary, R/o Village- Punar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Dhirendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Md. Sufiyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Atri P.S.Case no. 175 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioner is cousin brother of the husband of the deceased and he has no concern with the family affairs of the petitioner. It appears from the written report that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against this petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39286 of 2017 (3) dt.28-08-2017 2/2 weeks from today in connection with Atri P.S.Case No. 175 of 2014, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Gaya, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) N.K/- U T