Md. Taushif Alam @ Md. Tausif Nadaf v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50929 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Taushif Alam @ Md. Tausif Nadaf Son of Md. Sakir Nadaf @ Sakira Nadaf Village- Bhuthi, Ward No 08, P.S.- Bhuthi Sonbarsa, District -Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sonebarsa P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117, 109, 303(2), 352 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

On 05.02.2025, the informant's son confronted petitioner over a Rs. 5,000/- debt, leading to a fight. The petitioner, with others, allegedly assaulted him, causing injuries, and stole his gold chain.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 14-02-2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50929 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is delay of eight (8) days in lodging the FIR. It is next submitted that there is no evidence to established that there was any borrowing or lending of money. Informant is not the eye witness to the occurrence. As per impugned order, injury of the injured is found to be grievous in nature. Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge sheet in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sonebarsa P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50929 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 No. 49 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T