Satish Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4504 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2013 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Satish Manjhi, Son of Late Abhimannu Manjhi @ Mannu Manjhi, resident of village - Pathalkatti, P.S. Sherghati, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 03-02-2015 The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2013 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown. During investigation, the name of the petitioner has appeared in the confessional statement of the co-accused and later on, the petitioner has also confessed his guilt. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

The learned counsel for the State submits that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4504 of 2015 (2) dt.03-02-2015 2/2 petitioner is involved in several cases.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya/court concerned in Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No.81/2013 after framing of charge with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T