Rohit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44777 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav S/o Jagdish Yadav R/o village -Leela Bigha, PS- Kashichak, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44956 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada ====================================================== Bhuneshwar yadav S/O Late Lorik Yadav Resident of village- Leela Bigha, PS- Kashichak, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 45507 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada ====================================================== Rohit Yadav Son of Suresh Yadav Resident of Village- Lila Bigha (Bharanipur), P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44777 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Rajeev, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44956 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 45507 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ======================================================

2/4 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 132, 109, 121(1), 121(2), 324(4), 352 & 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case is that on receiving information about accused Sonu Kumar's assault case, the police reached Leela Bigha where Ravish Kumar and others obstructed them, abused, and along with 21 named and several unknown persons, attacked the police with lathis, bricks, and stones, injuring four personnel.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner, namely, Sanjay Yadav is in custody since 14-05-2025, having no criminal antecedent; petitioner, namely, Bhuneshwar yadav is in custody since 14-05-2025, having three criminal antecedents and petitioner, namely, Rohit Yadav is in custody since 20-05-2025, having no criminal antecedent. 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioners' counsel that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the

3/4 present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners, rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. From perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that petitioners were members of the mob. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioners, there being no specific allegation against the petitioners and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 8.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteeen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

4/4 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T