← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1650/2021bail granted

Raja Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-01Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1650 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2020 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== RAJA PASWAN Son of Naresh Paswan @ Ram Naresh Paswan R/o At Present Namita Enclave Flat No. 501, Ranjan Path, P.S. - Rupaspur, District - Patna. Permanent Address Village - Janipur Nagwan, P.S. - Janipur (Phulwarisharif), District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mithilesh Kr. Arya For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Aurangabad Mufasil P.S. Case No. 86 of 2020 for the offence registered under Sections 379, 411, 413 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in brief is that the informant's Mahindra Scorpio was stolen in front of his house. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1650 of 2021(2) dt.01-11-2021 2/2 further submitted that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused before the police, which has no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner was involved in two other cases, except this, in which, he is on bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Mufassil P.S. Case No. 86 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Jagdish/- U T