← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2067/2016disposed

Shiv Shankar Rai Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-02-25Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2067 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2377 of 2007 ====================================================== Shiv Shankar Rai Yadav, son of Late Ram Lakhan Rai, resident of village Mankauli, P.S. and P.O.- Kurhani, District- Muzaffarpur. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through its Registrar.

3. Dr. Pandit Plande son of not Known to the petitioner Vice Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

4. Sri Ratnesh Mishra Son of not Known to the petitioner, Registrar, Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

5. Sri Raj Narayan Singh son of not known to the petitioner, . Finance Officer, Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

6. Jay Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar

7. Sri Lok Nath Sahaya, son of not known to the petitioner, Vice Chancellor, Jay Prakash University, Chapra.

8. Bibhash Kumar Yadav, son of not known to the petitoner, Registrar, Jay Prakash University, Chapra.

9. Sri Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Son of not Known to the petitioner, Finance Officer, Jay Prakash University, Chapra. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha For J.P. University : Mr. Nagendra Kr. Singh, Advocate For B.R.A.B. University : Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 Considering the show-cause/supplementary showcause filed by the opposite parties, the Court is not inclined to proceed any further. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the opposite parties in appropriate proceeding.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U