Shambhu Kumar Jain v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10969 of 2013 =========================================================== Shambhu Kumar Jain, S/o Late Panna Lal Bothra, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Supaul, District Supaul, Proprietor Renuka Super Complex .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through Secretary, Department Of Finance, Central Secretariat New Delhi

2. The Managing Director, Central Bank of India Chandermukhi Nariman Point Mumbai Maharashtra

3. The Regional Director, Regional Office, Central Bank of India, Kosi Chowk, Saharsa

4. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Supaul Branch Supaul Bihar

5. The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, Central Bank of India, Mauryalok Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Saket Tiwary, Mr. Saket Gupta, Advocates For the Union of India : Mrs. Kanak Verma, CGC For Respondent-Bank : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Mrs. Manju Jha, Advocates =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-08-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities for settling the loan account of the petitioner by considering the case with leniency in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the harassment faced by him.

2. Mr. Saket Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner, states on instruction that the loan in question has since been

Patna High Court CWJC No.10969 of 2013 dt.01-08-2018 2/2 liquidated during the pendency of the writ petition in view of which the writ petition need not be pressed.

3. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 02.08.2018 Transmission Date N.A.