Umashankar Singh v. Mr. Atul Prasad And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2093 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5483 of 2008 ====================================================== Umashankar Singh, S/o Late Jag Narain Singh, R/o Vill- Tendua Makari, P.S.- Sanjhauli, Distt- Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mr. Atul Prasad, the Secretary Co-operative Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

3.

Mr. Manish Kumar, the Registrar, Co-operative Society, Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Patna.

4.

Mr. Baliram Singh, the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Co-operative Society, Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Patna.

5.

Mr. Nikesh Kumar, the Managing Director, Sasaram, Bhabhua Central Cooperative Bank Limited Sasaram under District Rohtas. 6.

Mr. Sanjay Singh, the Board of Directors, Sasaram, Bhabhua Central Cooperative Bank Limited Sasaram under District Rohtas through its Managing Director Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited Branch Sasaram under District Rohtas at Sasaram 7.

... ... Contemnors / Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar For the Contemnors /Opposite Parties :

Sri Bindhyachal Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Bindhyachal Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Managing Director, Sasaram Bhabhua Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Sasaram [hereinafter referred to as "Bank"].

The present petition was filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding against opposite parties on an allegation of

Patna High Court MJC No.2093 of 2016(5) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 willful disobedience to an order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5483 of 2008.

At the very outset, Sri Bindhyachal Rai, learned counsel for the Bank submits that order of writ court has already been complied with however some delay has occurred which was not intentional. Learned counsel for the petitioner was not in a position to dispute the fact however he requests for disposal of the present petition with observation that if any grievance still exists the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy. The prayer is allowed.

The contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U