Rajeshwar Sah @ Rajeswhar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46822 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-620 Year-2015 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rajeshwar Sah @ Rajeswhar Sah Son of Late Ram Chandra Sah Resident of Village- Shankar Saraiya tola Rama Singh, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran.

2.

Renu Devi Wife of Rajeshwar Sah @ Rajeswhar Sah Resident of VillageShankar Saraiya tola Rama Singh, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Ms.Gulnar Begum, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 620 of 2015 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 354, 448, 313, 511, 504, 506 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners assaulted the informant, causing injuries to her.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46822 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 petitioners submitted that the petitioners and informant are neighbours and due to land dispute, the occurrence took place and subsequent to that to buy peace of mind, they have compromised on 28.07.2023 and a duly sworn joint compromise petition has also been filed before the learned District Court. The compromise petition has been brought on record by way of Annexure 3.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties and upon perusal of the allegations made in the FIR, as well as, paragraph 14 of the bail application, wherein specific information has been given that the petitioners and the informant have settled their dispute and in this regard, they have arrived at a mutual settlement on terms and conditions as contained in settlement dated 28.01.2023 and a duly sworn joint compromise petition has also been filed before the learned District Court, the impugned order is modified to the extent that the learned District Court is directed to pass a fresh order, considering the law laid down by the Apex Court in case of Naushey Ali vs. State of U.P., reported in, (2025) 4 SCC 78, expeditiously not beyond the period of four weeks.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46822 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

7. Till then no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners in the aforesaid case.

8. The bail application, accordingly, stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T