Pavittar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56166 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-776 Year-2021 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== PAVITTAR RAI SON OF LATE SUBBA RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -BASAULI, P.S-. KURHANI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner is accused in connection with Kurhani P.S. Case No. 776 of 2021 registered under sections 8, 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur.

3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court vide order dated 27.03.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52195 of 2022, as contained in Annexure-1 to the bail application. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

4. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that earlier

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56166 of 2023(5) dt.03-11-2023 2/2 prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court on merit vide order dated 27.03.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52195 of 2022. Further he contended that in the instant case, now, there is no fresh ground to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5. Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T