← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46514/2025allowed

Neeraj Singh @ Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-01Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46514 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2022 Thana- RAJIVNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Neeraj Singh @ Neeraj Kumar S/O Late Deep Narayan Singh Resident of Road no.24, Rajiv Nagar, PS- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Raj, Adv.

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard Mr. Rahul Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 312 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant had gone to fetch vegetables and other articles from the market and as he reached near Panchvati Colony, 5-7 unknown miscreants stopped him and fired at him. The FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46514 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 case. He also submits that during the course of the investigation, one co-accused has named this petitioner. There is nothing except the confessional statement of the co-accused person. He next submits that no T.I. Parade has been conducted and there is no allegation of assault.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 312 of 2022, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T