Narayan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57229 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-631 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== NARAYAN KUMAR, Son of Vinod Sharma, Resident of Village- Govindpur, P.S.- Onkari (Ghosi), District- Jahanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 631 of 2020 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2020, charge-sheet has been submitted and has antecedent of one case and allegation of loot of Bolero Pick-up Van with goods worth Rs.1,50,000/- along with mobile from the driver of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was against unknown and the name of the petitioner came

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57229 of 2021(2) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 in the confessional statement of Md. Bittu and his own confessional statement. Learned counsel further submits that during the course of investigation it is also alleged that at the instance of Md. Bittu and the petitioner the looted Pick-Up Van was recovered from Maa Laxmi Garage. Learned counsel thus submits that after recovering the looted Bolero Pick-Up Van, the police falsely implicated the petitioner that it was recovered at the instance of petitioner and Md. Bittu.

Learned APP opposes the bail application.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, charge-sheet has been submitted and his name came in the confessional statement of Md. Bittu, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 631 of 2020.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) uday/- U T