← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51882/2025bail granted

Amir Khan @ Aamir Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51882 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-678 Year-2023 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== Amir Khan @ Aamir Khan S/O Mohn Hasan Resident of Shakurpur I-200, Saraswati Bihar, North-West Delhi, P.S- Netaji Subhash Palace, Delhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Farzana Khatoon D/O Riyaz Ahmad R/O Baswariya Masjid Mohalla, Ward No. 30, P.S- Bettiah Town, Distt.- West Chamaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Md. Irfanul Haque, Advocate Ms. Anjali Kumari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP For the Complainant :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. None appears on behalf of O.P. No.2.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of D.P. Act.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner being husband has been falsely implicated in the instant case by O.P. No.2. It is also submitted that petitioner and O.P. No.2 by way of mutual consent have taken Talaq, as would manifest from Annexure-P/2 series at page 27. It is further submitted that Talaq by mutual consent was obtained on 7th of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51882 of 2025(4) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 September, 2022 and thereafter the instant false complaint case came to be instituted. It is next submitted that this perhaps explains why no one appears on behalf of O.P. No.2 to contest the case.

4. Learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bettiah (West Champaran) in connection with Complaint Case No.678C/2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T