← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47876/2022dismissed

Shashi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47876 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== SHASHI RANJAN KUMAR S/o Mahesh Prasad Resident of Areraj, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Areraj, O.P., District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhu Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-02-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Govindganj (Areraj) P.S. Case No.67 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 365, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 08 of POCSO Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith other co-accused persons kidnapped the daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47876 of 2022(3) dt.20-02-2023 2/2 petitioner. He has been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the victim has supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded u/s 164 of Cr.PC. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T