← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47780/2022dismissed

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47780 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2022 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Son Of Ayodhya Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Rajla Graiya, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau through its Superintendent of Police, Patna. Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Vigilance : Mr. Anil Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 237 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is alleged to have obtained appointment as Panchayat Teacher on the basis of forged and fabricated documents.

It is submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. At the time of appointment, petitioner furnished all the relevant documents and after verification of those documents by the competent authority,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47780 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 petitioner was appointed to the aforesaid post. Petitioner has committed no offence.

However counsel for State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that pursuant to an order passed by High Court, an enquiry was conducted in which the Intermediate certificate submitted by the petitioner was found forged and fabricated.

Considering the facts aforesaid and gravity of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T