Himanshu Kumar @ Raja v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44557 of 2017 (3) dt.23-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44557 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Himanshu Kumar @ Raja Son of Vijay Singh, R/o Village- Bangara Choupan, P.S. Kanti Panapur O.P., District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kanti Panapur O.P. Police Station Case No. 90 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner has been made accused in this case merely on the ground of suspicion and except suspicion, no cogent material has come against the petitioner during course of investigation. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44557 of 2017 (3) dt.23-11-2017 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti Panapur O.P. Police Station Case No. 90 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T