Vijay Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48131 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2021 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Thakur Son of Ramdev Thakur Resident of Village - Paroo Kaswa, P.S.- Paroo, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioner named in the F.I.R. caught the uncle of the informant and started assaulting him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48131 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 2/3 present case is counter blast of the Paroo P.S. Case No. 53 of 2021 filed by the mother of the co-accused against the informant and their family members. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that the injury report suggests that the uncle of the informant has received a single injury. The learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No.

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48131 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 3/3 court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) vanisha/- U T