← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4681/2021bail rejected

Vinod Chaudhary @ Vinod Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-23Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4681 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vinod Chaudhary @ Vinod Kumar Chaudhary Son of Yogendra Chaudhary Resident of Village - Jiyalal Chowk Najirpur, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 23-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 102 of 2020, P.R. No. 6/20 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation in the FIR, acting on a tip off, police party has reached on spot and recovered 62.200 litres illicit liquor from the hut of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4681 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious physical possession.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the alleged hut belongs to the petitioner, from where recovery of illegal liquor has been made, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of rejection.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T