Mukesh Rai And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.967 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3237 Year-2012 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ======================================================

1. Mukesh Rai, S/o Late Supan Rai,

2. Deventi Devi, W/o Late Supan Rai, Both are Resident of Village- Najarmeera, P.S.- Sonpur, Distt.- Chapra- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Chanda Devi, wife of Mukesh Rai, D/o Sri Yogendra Rai, resident of villageNajarmeera, P.S.- Sonpur, Distt.- Chapra at Saran, at present R/o villageJameera, P.S.-Dariyapur, District-Chapra, Saran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Sinha,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 24-01-2019 Case has been called out. Sri Satyendra Kumar Bhatnagar, learned counsel appeared and submitted that learned senior counsel is engaged in some other court, just to arrive. The learned counsel himself has not expressed his desirability to argue this petition. His senior has not turn up upto 4.15 P.M. Gone through the order impugned in consonance with the materials available on the record.

From perusal of the record, it is evident that during course of an inquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. witnesses have supported the case. During midst thereof, as is evident the matter was amicably sorted out whereupon the victim had gone to her Sasural where, she died and for that a case was instituted.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.967 of 2017(3) dt.24-01-2019 2/2 As is evident from the judgment, the witnesses have deposed under the banner of compromise.

Be that as it may, that happens to be a separate incident. Accordingly, the instant petition has got no merit and is rejected.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) Prakash Narayan U T