Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50807/2025bail rejected

Vikash Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50807 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025 Thana- TEYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Sah son of Ashok Sah Village- Hetampur, Ps- Tiyar, DistBhojpur at Ara ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BNSS, 2023') for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection with Tiyar P.S. Case No.41 of 2025, lodged on 06.05.2025, under Section 309(4) of B.N.S. 2023.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and two unknown accused persons. The allegation against the petitioner is of pointing pistol on the informant and other accused persons snatched Rs.7500/- and mobile from the pocket of the informant.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50807 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that informant has submitted an application on 28.05.2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara stating therein that he has named the petitioner on suspicion and he has not seen the face of the petitioner. Counsel submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean. He submits that there are two criminal cases pending against the petitioner.

6. Considering the criminal antecedent as well as allegation against the petitioner, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby refused.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U